The emissions characterized as floating-roof landing losses in this study are those that would be expected to occur if a floating roof is landed in the course of normal operations and subsequently refilled. This study does not address emissions that may result from additional activities, such as degassing or tank cleaning, that may occur while the tank is empty. The model is intended for use with any petroleum liquid.
The inclusion in the model of the stock liquid’s physical properties (i.e. true vapor pressure, vapor molecular weight, and liquid density) appears to effectively differentiate crude oil from gasoline, and therefore no further differentiation was made in the form of product factors or other product-specific adjustments.
The model does not directly address standing idle losses for partial days, but it would be reasonable to estimate the emissions for a partial day by estimating the standing idle emissions for a single day and then prorating that estimate by the number of hours that the floating roof was actually landed. Any emission factor is properly understood as representative of the actual emission rates that are typical for a population of emission points.
For a non-uniform population, however, there is an inherent level of uncertainty associated with the application of the general emission factor to any individual emission point. Some of the critical sources of uncertainty in this model of floating-roof landing losses are addressed in the comments on the confidence associated with each step of the model. As noted in these comments, some of the variables have not been well defined, and the values shown are intended to serve only as placeholders—pending further research.
